Loverboy Lawsuit 2026: The Kyle Cooke Trademark Case Closed in 2021, and No New Claim Exists
Quick Answer
- The Loverboy lawsuit is real, but it was a private trademark dispute between a New York bar and Kyle Cooke’s company.
- No settlement amount was disclosed, and no per-person payout exists or ever existed.
- There is no claim deadline or administrator because this was never a class action or consumer settlement.
You searched for the Loverboy lawsuit because you saw a headline about Kyle Cooke, the Summer House star, or you heard the brand was in legal trouble. The case is real, but it closed years ago. It never involved public money.
A New York bar called Loverboy, operated by Mos Eisley, LLC, sued Cooke’s Loverboy, Inc. in September 2020 for trademark infringement . The bar had used the name since 2017. Cooke launched his hard tea and cocktail brand in 2018. The bar said the name and branding were too close, and consumers would be confused.
The case was dismissed in January 2021 after the parties settled . No settlement amount was disclosed. No court-approved fund was created. No claim process exists.
This article breaks down what the court record actually shows, why scam pages are using Cooke’s name, what the real financial story around Loverboy is in 2026, and how to tell a closed private lawsuit from a public settlement.
The Facts
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Case | Mos Eisley, LLC v. Loverboy, Inc. et al |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Case Number | 1:20-cv-07616 |
| Status | Dismissed January 2021 after settlement |
| Fund Size | None. No public fund created |
| Est. Per Person | Not applicable |
| Claim Deadline | None. This is not a claims case |
| Administrator | Not yet appointed |
| Proof Needed | None for public. No claim form exists |
Is the Loverboy Lawsuit Real or a Scam?
The Loverboy lawsuit is real, but any page telling you to file a claim for money is a scam. The case was a private trademark dispute between two businesses. It was filed in the Southern District of New York on September 16, 2020, and dismissed on January 8, 2021 .
The plaintiff was Mos Eisley, LLC, which operated a cocktail bar called Loverboy in New York City. The defendants were Loverboy, Inc. and Kyle Cooke. The bar claimed it had used the Loverboy name since 2017, before Cooke’s brand launched .
There is no public fund, no administrator, and no claim form. The settlement terms were never made public. If a page tells you to enter your information to claim Loverboy settlement money, close it.
Key Takeaway: The Loverboy lawsuit was a private business dispute that ended in 2021, and no public claim process exists.
How Much Was the Loverboy Lawsuit Settlement?
No settlement amount was disclosed in the Loverboy lawsuit. The case was dismissed in January 2021 after the parties reached an agreement, and the terms were not filed publicly . Any dollar figure you see attached to this case is speculation.
Trademark disputes like this one often settle with licensing terms, a name change, or a confidential payment. None of that creates money for the public.
| Potential Outcome | Status |
|---|---|
| Settlement fund | Not yet confirmed (never disclosed) |
| Per-person payout | Not applicable |
| Public claim process | None exists |
If a page tells you a specific Loverboy lawsuit payout amount, ask where it came from. The answer will not be a court record.
Why Is There No Loverboy Lawsuit Claim Form?
There is no claim form because this was a private trademark lawsuit between two companies. It was not a class action, and no court ever approved a settlement fund for consumers. A claim form only exists after a court certifies a class and approves a settlement with a public notice process.
The Loverboy case involved two parties: Mos Eisley, LLC and Loverboy, Inc. The dispute was about a name, not a product defect or consumer harm. The public had no standing to join, and there was no money set aside for anyone outside the case.
Reality Check
Reality Check: No one texts you settlement money from a trademark dispute. The Loverboy lawsuit ended in 2021 with a private agreement between two businesses. If a page asks for your information or a fee to process a Loverboy payout, it is collecting your data. Filing a claim is free when a real settlement exists, and no such settlement exists here.
What Is the Loverboy Debt Story in 2026?
The Loverboy debt story is separate from the lawsuit, and it resurfaced in 2026 because of Kyle Cooke’s split from Amanda Batula. Cooke said on Summer House in 2022 that he was $4 million in debt from a business loan and had spent $200,000 on legal fees .
That legal fee figure is often linked to the trademark case, but the case was dismissed in 2021. The debt is a business loan, not a court judgment. Cooke confirmed the debt in a January 2026 interview and said he and Batula do not plan a messy divorce fight .
The couple announced their separation on January 19, 2026, and they never signed a prenuptial agreement . That means New York courts could treat Loverboy’s debt as marital debt if the divorce proceeds, depending on when it was incurred .
What Happened in the Loverboy Trademark Case?
The Loverboy trademark case was filed on September 16, 2020, in the Southern District of New York . The bar claimed prior rights to the Loverboy name and said Cooke’s canned cocktails would confuse consumers . Cooke’s side counterclaimed, arguing his brand had the right to use the name and that the bar’s reach was local while his products were sold more widely .
The case moved quickly. Cooke’s team filed an answer and counterclaim in November 2020 . By January 2021, the case was dismissed . The dismissal order closed the federal case, and no further public filings followed.
Key Takeaway: The trademark case lasted about four months of active litigation and ended with a private dismissal in January 2021.
What Other Lawsuits Has Loverboy Faced?
Loverboy, Inc. faced at least one other legal dispute: a case involving Night Shift Distributing, LLC. Podcast coverage of Cooke’s legal history lists both Mos Eisley, LLC v. Loverboy Inc. and Night Shift Distributing, LLC v. Loverboy Inc. as separate matters .
The details of the Night Shift case are not fully documented in public dockets available for this article. No settlement amount, dismissal date, or public fund tied to that case appears in the records reviewed. Treat any specific claims about it as unconfirmed unless you can find the docket.
What is confirmed is that neither case created a public settlement or a claim process.
What Happens Next for Loverboy in 2026?
The legal cases are closed. The financial story is not.
January 2026: Cooke and Batula announced their separation .
March 2026: Reports surfaced that the couple may divorce without a prenup, putting Loverboy’s debt and equity into play .
Expected 2026: Any divorce filing would go through New York courts, where Loverboy’s debt could be treated as marital property depending on timing .
Not yet confirmed: Whether a divorce case has been filed, and how a court would divide the business debt.
No public action: No claim deadline, no administrator, no payout window for the trademark case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Loverboy lawsuit real?
Yes. A New York bar called Loverboy sued Kyle Cooke’s Loverboy, Inc. for trademark infringement in September 2020.
Can I file a claim in the Loverboy lawsuit?
No. It was a private trademark dispute between two businesses, not a class action with a public fund.
How much was the Loverboy lawsuit settlement?
The settlement amount was never disclosed. The case was dismissed in January 2021.
Is Kyle Cooke’s Loverboy still in debt?
Cooke said in 2022 he was $4 million in debt from a business loan. He confirmed the debt again in January 2026.
Did Kyle Cooke and Amanda Batula have a prenup?
No. Batula has said publicly that not signing a prenup was a major mistake.
Why is the Loverboy lawsuit showing up in 2026?
The case is closed. It resurfaces because of news about Cooke’s separation and Loverboy’s debt, but no new lawsuit exists.
Where can I check if a Loverboy settlement is real?
Look for a court docket, a named administrator, and a court-approved notice. The trademark case has none of those because it was private.
The Bottom Line
The Loverboy lawsuit is closed. It was a trademark fight between a New York bar and Kyle Cooke’s company, dismissed in January 2021 with no public fund and no claim process. The debt story is real, but it is a business loan, not a settlement. If a page tells you otherwise, it is selling something.
