Pom Wonderful Lawsuit 2026: Status, Payout, Who Qualifies

Quick Answer

• A PFAS class action, No. 1:23-cv-01242, survived dismissal November 25, 2024. Its 2026 status isn’t confirmed.
• Payout: not determined. No settlement fund, certified class, or claim form has been confirmed.
• No claim deadline exists. The latest confirmed ruling is dated November 25, 2024.

The Pom Wonderful lawsuit isn’t one case. It’s three separate ones, and only one involves consumers: a PFAS class action in New York federal court.

That case, Hernandez v. The Wonderful Company LLC, survived a dismissal bid on November 25, 2024. No certified class or settlement is confirmed, and no claim form exists.

On a related note, check out Revive Essential Oils Lawsuit 2026: Two ADA Suits, No Class Action, and No Settlement Fund

This guide separates the three cases, shows what each did and didn’t pay, and lists false advertising claims you can file now. One surprise: POM once sued for about $77 million and lost to a jury.

Is there a Pom Wonderful lawsuit in 2026?

The main Pom Wonderful lawsuit is a proposed PFAS class action filed February 14, 2023.

It’s Hernandez v. The Wonderful Company LLC, No. 1:23-cv-01242, in the Southern District of New York. Judge Edgardo Ramos presides. The latest ruling we confirmed is dated November 25, 2024.

Here’s what we could and couldn’t verify:

• Confirmed: the filing date, the case number, the court, and the November 25, 2024 ruling
• Not yet confirmed: class certification, any settlement, a trial date, and 2026 docket entries

Two older Pom Wonderful cases are finished. Pages that promise a payout date for the current case are guessing.

Is there a Pom Wonderful class action settlement you can claim?

No Pom Wonderful settlement is open for claims as of October 31, 2026.

We found no fund, administrator, claim form, or deadline. A consumer-news tracker reviewed in October 2026 reached the same conclusion.

The other two cases didn’t produce consumer payouts either. The FTC case ended in an order, not a refund fund. The Coca-Cola case ended in a jury loss for POM.

If a page asks you to “register” for POM money, it isn’t tied to any court process we found.

Which Pom Wonderful lawsuits exist, and which one involves consumers?

Three lawsuits carry the POM name, and only the 2023 PFAS case involves consumers seeking money.

The first was a competitor fight under the federal Lanham Act. The second was a regulator’s deceptive advertising case. The third is the one that could someday pay you.

Mixing them up is the most common error on pages ranking for this term.

Key Takeaway: Only the PFAS class action could ever pay consumers, and it has no confirmed fund, class, or claim form.

How much money can you get from the Pom Wonderful lawsuit?

Not yet determined. No settlement exists, so no per-person amount does either.

If the PFAS case settles, expect a pro rata split. Picture a bakery cutting one cake for thousands of customers. More claimants mean smaller slices.

A comparable consumer case shows the scale. The Joint Juice false advertising settlement set a $70.84 million fund and reported $10 to $25 per unit. That’s a different company and a different case, offered only as a reference point.

Are there open false advertising settlements you can claim instead?

Yes, two false advertising class actions are open for claims as of October 31, 2026: Apple’s Siri case and Dr. Squatch’s “natural” case.

Apple’s claims run through the administrator Verita Global. Dr. Squatch buyers must have bought products labeled “natural” between November 1, 2018 and August 29, 2026.

Amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed. Check each official settlement website before filing.

Reality Check: No one texts you Pom Wonderful settlement money first. No POM claim form exists, so any “registration” page or fee request is unreliable. Filing a real claim is free.

Who could join the Pom Wonderful PFAS class action?

The proposed class covers U.S. buyers of POM Wonderful 100% Pomegranate Juice for personal use.

That’s a proposal, not a certified class. No one is enrolled yet. The complaint asked for the fullest period allowed by law, and no class period is confirmed.

You may qualify later if you:

• Bought POM Wonderful 100% Pomegranate Juice in the United States
• Bought it for personal use
• Bought it within a class period the court sets
• Aren’t excluded under any future settlement terms

The named plaintiffs are Bertha Hernandez and Wayne Catalano. The court let their New York business law claims proceed. Whether a class would be nationwide or limited to New York is not yet confirmed.

How do you check the status of the Pom Wonderful lawsuit?

You check by searching the case number, 1:23-cv-01242, in the Southern District of New York’s docket.

1. Write down the case number: 1:23-cv-01242.
2. Search it on PACER or a free docket tracker.
3. Scan recent entries for “class certification” or “settlement.”
4. Watch for court-approved notices by email or mail.
5. Photograph bottles and save receipts now.
6. Never pay anyone to “enroll” you.
7. Ask a licensed attorney about your own options.

A real settlement notice names the court, the case number, and an administrator. If a message lacks all three, skip it.

Docket entries can lag press coverage by weeks. The docket is the primary record.

Do you need a receipt to claim in a Pom Wonderful case?

No proof requirement exists yet, because no settlement exists.

Future rules would come from the settlement terms. Many consumer settlements work like a store return without a receipt. You get a smaller capped amount without proof and more with it. Dr. Squatch’s settlement follows that pattern: five products with no receipt, up to 25 with proof.

Explore this too: Vioxx Lawsuit 2026: The $4.85 Billion Settlement Is Closed, the Investor Case Paid Out, and New Claims Are Barred

Bottle-level evidence mattered in this case. On December 29, 2023, the court dismissed the first complaint for lack of standing. The plaintiff hadn’t alleged that any bottle she bought tested positive for PFAS.

Keep these records:

• Receipts or loyalty-card purchase history
• Photos of bottles, labels, and lot numbers
• Bank or card statements showing the purchase

Can you sue Pom Wonderful yourself?

Consumers can bring claims under state consumer protection laws, but most join a class action instead.

The Hernandez complaint cited New York General Business Law, breach of express warranty, fraud, constructive fraud, and unjust enrichment. Consumers can’t sue under the federal Lanham Act. That route belongs to competitors.

If a class is certified, you’d normally get a chance to opt out and sue separately. Opting out means no payment from that settlement. A single juice purchase rarely supports an individual lawsuit, and small claims limits vary by state.

We’re not a law firm. A licensed attorney can tell you whether your facts support a claim.

Key Takeaway: Consumers can’t use the Lanham Act, so their only path to money is a state-law class action, and that path has no payout today.

What’s the latest in the Pom Wonderful PFAS case?

The latest ruling we confirmed is November 25, 2024, when the court largely denied POM’s second motion to dismiss.

The November 2024 ruling let negligence per se and New York business law claims go forward. It dismissed the unjust enrichment claim as redundant. Top Class Actions reported that the parent, The Wonderful Company, was dismissed from the case.

Not yet confirmed: any 2025 or 2026 docket activity, a class certification motion, or a trial date.

Did Pom Wonderful win or lose its lawsuit against Coca-Cola?

POM won at the Supreme Court in 2014 and lost at the jury trial in 2016.

On June 12, 2014, the Supreme Court ruled 8-0 that POM could sue under the Lanham Act. Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion, and Justice Breyer took no part. The ruling held that FDA labeling rules didn’t bar the claim.

On March 21, 2016, a Los Angeles federal jury unanimously rejected POM’s claims. The trial lasted six days. POM had sought about $77 million. Coca-Cola said its label met FDA requirements. POM said Coca-Cola intentionally confused consumers.

The disputed Minute Maid blend contained:

Coca-Cola discontinued the product in 2014 after poor sales.

Did the FTC fine Pom Wonderful for false advertising?

The FTC’s case produced a cease-and-desist order, not a cash settlement.

The FTC issued its complaint on September 27, 2010. Its January 2013 decision found 36 ads problematic. The agency said POM’s studies didn’t show the benefits it claimed.

On January 30, 2015, the D.C. Circuit affirmed most of the decision. It struck one piece, a baseline requirement for all disease claims, on First Amendment grounds. The Supreme Court denied review on May 2, 2016, in No. 15-525.

Under the order, future disease treatment or prevention claims need at least one randomized, well-controlled human clinical trial. These cases moved like a tax audit: years of paperwork before a result. We found no consumer refund fund in the sources checked.

Key Takeaway: POM lost the FTC fight and the Coca-Cola jury trial paid nobody, so no past POM case left a payout behind.

Also worth exploring: Happy Baby Lawsuit 2026: No Settlement, No Claim Form, and a Causation Ruling That Could End the Autism Claims

What are PFAS and why are they in the pomegranate juice lawsuit?

PFAS are man-made chemicals that persist in the body and environment, which is why the complaint calls them “forever chemicals.”

The complaint alleges July 2022 testing found 2.5 parts per trillion of PFOS and 6.5 parts per trillion of PFPeA in POM juice. Parts per trillion are tiny amounts. Whether they’re harmful is disputed.

The plaintiffs say shoppers paid a premium for a natural label. The court said questions of fact remain about the PFAS levels.

We aren’t a health authority. These are allegations, not findings.

What is Pom Wonderful’s defense in the PFAS lawsuit?

POM argues the label never promised the absence of PFAS, which it calls common microcontaminants in food and the environment.

The defendants also argued that “natural” label cases built on trace contaminants are routinely dismissed early. They said plaintiffs hadn’t shown the PFAS levels pose health risks.

Judge Ramos didn’t accept that at the pleading stage. He found plaintiffs plausibly alleged shoppers would expect no detectable PFAS. He said questions remain about whether PFAS were added intentionally or incidentally, whether levels were insignificant, and whether the product met regulations.

An early ruling lets claims proceed. It doesn’t prove them. POM hasn’t lost this case.

Why did the Supreme Court’s POM v. Coca-Cola ruling matter?

It confirmed that competitors can sue over food labels under the Lanham Act, even when FDA rules also apply.

The Lanham Act lets businesses sue over claims that misrepresent a product’s nature, characteristics, or qualities. Consumers can’t use it. That’s why shoppers rely on state laws and class actions instead.

Justice Kennedy’s opinion warned that blocking these suits could leave less protection for food and beverage labeling than in less regulated industries. The jury then showed how hard these cases are to win. Proving a label is misleading takes more than showing a mismatch.

The case still shapes advertising law today. Competitors police each other’s labels, and regulators and class lawyers follow.

Key Takeaway: The Coca-Cola ruling opened the door for competitor suits, but a jury still decides whether a label actually misled anyone.

What Happens Next

• Expected, not confirmed: Further proceedings in No. 1:23-cv-01242. No dates are verified.
• Possible next stage: A class certification motion. We haven’t confirmed whether one is filed.
• If the case settles: A court preliminary approval, then notice, then a claim deadline. None exists today.
• November 27, 2026: Dr. Squatch claim deadline, the nearest open false advertising claim.
• December 21, 2026: Apple claim, exclusion, and objection deadline.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a Pom Wonderful class action settlement?

No, we found no settlement, fund, or claim form.
A PFAS class action exists but has no confirmed class or settlement.
Any page promising a payout date is guessing.

Can I get money from the Pom Wonderful lawsuit?

Not at this time, because no payout has been approved.
The PFAS case could settle later.
Amounts would depend on the fund and the number of claims.

What is the Pom Wonderful PFAS lawsuit about?

It alleges POM Wonderful 100% Pomegranate Juice contains PFAS despite “All Natural” labeling.
The case is Hernandez v. The Wonderful Company, No. 1:23-cv-01242.
POM disputes the claims.

Did Pom Wonderful win the Coca-Cola lawsuit?

No, a jury rejected POM’s claims on March 21, 2016.
POM had sought about $77 million.
It won an earlier Supreme Court ruling that let the case go to trial.

Did the FTC sue Pom Wonderful?

Yes, the FTC issued a complaint on September 27, 2010.
Courts upheld most of its order, and the Supreme Court denied review on May 2, 2016.
The result was an order, not a refund fund.

Is Pom Wonderful juice safe?

We can’t say, because we aren’t a health authority.
The lawsuit alleges parts-per-trillion PFAS levels.
Whether those levels are harmful is disputed, and the court found open questions of fact.

How do I check the case status?

Search case number 1:23-cv-01242 in the Southern District of New York.
Look for entries about class certification or settlement.
Real notices name a court, case number, and administrator.

Where can I file a false advertising claim right now?

Two are open: Dr. Squatch until November 27, 2026, and Apple until December 21, 2026.
Amounts depend on valid claims filed.
Use each official settlement website.

Save your POM receipts and bottle photos now, and track case number 1:23-cv-01242 for real updates. Ignore any page promising a payout date.

If you want a claim you can file today, check the open false advertising settlements. The earliest deadline is November 27, 2026.

If you are curious, also see Greenies Lawsuit 2026: No Open Settlement, No Claim Form, and Why the 2007 Case Is Closed