Latham Pools Lawsuit 2026: Settlement, Claim Deadline, and How It Affects You
Quick Answer
- Latham Pools lawsuit is a company versus company intellectual property dispute, not a consumer claim.
- There is no settlement fund, no payout tiers, and no claim deadline for homeowners.
- The case is stayed as of June 4, 2026, meaning litigation is paused pending further order.
The Latham Pools lawsuit is a federal intellectual property case, not a class action settlement with money waiting for consumers. Latham Pool Products, Inc. sued Pools Premium LLC on August 29, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas .
If you own a Latham pool or bought from Pools Premium, this case does not create a claim form for you to file. There is no settlement administrator, no payout fund, and no deadline to submit a receipt. That confusion is worth clearing up first, because the search results for this term mix two very different things.
This article explains what the lawsuit actually alleges, who is involved, what the court docket shows as of September 2026, and what it means for pool owners on both sides. One detail most coverage misses: Latham sent a cease and desist letter to Pools Premium back in September 2023, and the company says it never received a response .
The Facts
| Case | Latham Pool Products, Inc. v. Pools Premium LLC |
|---|---|
| Status | Stayed as of June 4, 2026 |
| Fund Size | Not applicable. No settlement fund exists |
| Est. Per Person | Not applicable. This is not a consumer settlement |
| Claim Deadline | None. No claims process for consumers |
| Administrator | Not applicable |
| Proof Needed | Not applicable |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, Austin Division |
| Case Number | 1:25-cv-01398 |
Is the Latham Pools Lawsuit Legit or a Scam?
The Latham Pools lawsuit is a legitimate federal court case with a real docket, real filings, and a real judge. It is not a scam, but it is also not a settlement you can join.
The confusion comes from how search engines mix terms. When you search for “Latham Pools lawsuit,” you may see results about class action settlements or consumer claims. That is not what this is. This is Latham suing a competitor, Pools Premium, for allegedly copying its pool designs, marketing images, and product names .
Court records show Judge Alan D. Albright is assigned to the case, and the docket includes dozens of filings, motions for pro hac vice admission, scheduling orders, and a stay entry on June 4, 2026 . This is a live federal litigation, not a marketing gimmick.
There is no money for consumers here. If someone contacts you claiming to represent a “Latham Pools settlement” and asks for your information or a fee, that is a red flag. No such settlement exists.
How Much Is the Latham Pools Lawsuit Worth?
There is no fixed settlement amount because the case has not settled. Latham is seeking monetary remedies that include Pools Premium’s profits, treble damages for willful infringement, and attorneys’ fees, but no dollar figure is confirmed in the public docket .
The complaint asks the court for injunctive relief, actual damages, an accounting of profits, and enhanced damages. None of those numbers have been verified, approved, or agreed to by the parties.
Not yet determined. Any article claiming a specific payout amount for this case is guessing. The docket does not show a settlement conference, a mediation report, or a damages award.
What the complaint does say is that Latham believes Pools Premium’s conduct was willful. That matters because willful infringement can lead to treble damages under the Patent Act and enhanced statutory damages under the Copyright Act . But those are allegations, not awards.
| Claim Type | What Latham Seeks | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Patent infringement | Damages, treble damages, fees | Not yet determined |
| Copyright infringement | Statutory damages, profits | Not yet determined |
| Trademark infringement | Injunction, profits, damages | Not yet determined |
| False advertising | Injunction, damages | Not yet determined |
| Unfair competition | Damages, injunction | Not yet determined |
Do You Qualify for a Latham Pools Settlement?
You do not qualify for a Latham Pools settlement because no settlement exists and no claims process has been established. This case does not include a class of consumers, and the court has not certified any class.
If you bought a pool from Pools Premium and believe you were misled, that is a separate issue. You would need to speak with your own attorney about your own potential claims. This federal case between two companies does not automatically give you a claim.
The same goes for Latham pool owners. If you own a Latham pool and are happy with it, this lawsuit does not require any action from you. Latham is enforcing its intellectual property rights, not compensating customers.
Key Takeaway: The Latham Pools lawsuit is a business dispute with no consumer payout, no claim form, and no deadline for pool owners to act on.
What Is the Latham Pools Lawsuit About?
The Latham Pools lawsuit is about alleged copying of pool designs, photos, and marketing materials. Latham claims Pools Premium used Latham’s copyrighted images, replicated its fiberglass pool surfaces, and falsely advertised copycat products as equivalent to Latham’s .
The complaint paints a detailed picture. Latham says Pools Premium copied images from Latham’s website and brochures and displayed them as its own. The filing includes side-by-side exhibits showing Latham’s “Bermuda” pool design next to Pools Premium’s “Maldivas Sunset,” and Latham’s “Corinthian” next to Pools Premium’s “Punta Cana” .
Latham also claims Pools Premium used the federally registered CRYSTITE trademark without permission. The complaint says Pools Premium’s use of that mark, along with copied product images, was designed to confuse consumers into thinking they were buying Latham-quality pools .
The case involves multiple legal theories: patent infringement, copyright infringement, trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, false advertising, and unfair competition under Texas law .
Reality Check: No settlement administrator will ever text or email you about a Latham Pools payout. Filing a claim is not part of this case, and anyone charging a fee to “process” your Latham claim is not legitimate. The only real deadline in this case belongs to the lawyers, not to consumers.
Who Is Involved in the Latham Pools Lawsuit?
Two companies are involved: Latham Pool Products, Inc. as the plaintiff, and Pools Premium LLC as the defendant. No consumers are parties to this case.
Latham Pool Products is a Delaware corporation with its main office in Latham, New York. It is the largest designer and manufacturer of in-ground residential pools in North America, with over 500,000 installations and about 15% of the North American pool market .
Pools Premium LLC is a Texas company based in San Antonio. The complaint identifies its principal office at 6800 Park Ten Boulevard, Suite 217N .
Judge Alan D. Albright is the presiding judge in the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. The case was initially referred to Magistrate Judge Dustin M. Howell, but an order on March 20, 2026 removed the referral .
Latham is represented by the law firm Amstutz PLLC, based in Austin, along with several out-of-state attorneys admitted pro hac vice .
What Does the Latham Pools Lawsuit Allege?
The Latham Pools lawsuit alleges that Pools Premium engaged in a pattern of copying Latham’s protected designs, images, and brand identifiers to sell competing pools. The complaint lists five main categories of misconduct.
The core allegations include:
- Patent infringement: Pools Premium’s “Ocean Blue” fiberglass surface allegedly infringes Latham’s design patent, and other pending patents cover additional surfaces .
- Copyright infringement: Pools Premium allegedly copied Latham’s pool illustrations, top-down images, and installation guides registered with the U.S. Copyright Office .
- Trademark infringement: Pools Premium allegedly used Latham’s registered CRYSTITE mark in its marketing .
- False advertising: Pools Premium allegedly claimed its pools were equivalent to Latham’s and offered “superior finishes” and “unmatched guarantee” at “a fraction of the price” .
- Unfair competition: Texas state law claims for unjust enrichment and unfair competition .
Latham sent a cease and desist letter to Pools Premium on September 26, 2023, detailing the alleged infringement. According to the complaint, Pools Premium never responded and continued the conduct .
How Do You File a Claim in the Latham Pools Lawsuit?
You cannot file a claim in the Latham Pools lawsuit because it is not a claims-based settlement. There is no claim form, no submission deadline, and no administrator accepting consumer filings.
If you are a Latham pool owner with a warranty issue, that is a separate matter. Latham has a warranty process, and you would contact the retailer or dealer who sold you the pool. The federal lawsuit against Pools Premium does not affect that process.
If you are a Pools Premium customer with concerns about whether your pool was misrepresented, you would need to consult a private attorney. This case does not create an automatic claim for you.
The only people who file documents in this case are the attorneys for Latham and Pools Premium. The public docket shows filings from both sides, but no consumer claim mechanism .
What Happens Next in the Latham Pools Lawsuit?
The Latham Pools lawsuit is currently stayed, meaning litigation activity is paused. The stay was entered on June 4, 2026, and the docket does not explain the reason in the public summary .
June 4, 2026: Case stayed by court order. All deadlines and litigation activity paused.
Expected late 2026: Parties may file a motion to lift the stay or report settlement status.
Expected 2027: If the stay lifts, discovery resumes and a trial date may be set.
If no settlement: The case proceeds to trial on patent, copyright, and trademark claims.
If settlement: A confidential agreement may resolve the case without a public damages figure.
A stay is like putting a phone call on hold. The line is still open, but nothing is happening until someone picks it back up. The docket does not say when that might be.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Latham Pools lawsuit a class action settlement?
No. It is an intellectual property lawsuit between Latham Pool Products and Pools Premium LLC, not a consumer class action.
How much can I get from the Latham Pools lawsuit?
Nothing. There is no consumer payout, no settlement fund, and no claims process for individuals.
Do I need to file a claim if I own a Latham pool?
No. The lawsuit does not require any action from Latham pool owners or Pools Premium customers.
What is the Latham Pools lawsuit about?
It is about alleged copying of pool designs, marketing images, and trademarks by a competitor, Pools Premium LLC.
Who is Pools Premium LLC?
Pools Premium is a Texas-based pool company that Latham accuses of copying its designs and advertising.
When did the Latham Pools lawsuit start?
Latham filed the complaint on August 29, 2025, in the Western District of Texas .
Is the Latham Pools lawsuit still active?
Yes, but it is stayed as of June 4, 2026, meaning litigation is paused pending further order.
Will there be a Latham Pools settlement?
That is not yet confirmed. The case could settle, go to trial, or remain stayed. No settlement has been announced.
